Mary Writes

Is your platform engineering mature enough to need Radius?

The Stack

November 17, 2025

Mary Branscombe's avatar
Mary Branscombe
5mo

another of my platform engineering deep dives suggested by readers made timely by a feature requested by users that isn't just useful; it effectively reengineers Radius to be much easier to adapt to a wider range of runtimes as well as the Crossplane-style custom resources it explicitly adds. (p/w)

Is your platform engineering mature enough to need Radius?

Is your platform engineering mature enough to need Radius?

How to actually describe an application in a way that includes all the technical details about its life cycle dependencies is actually pretty important…


https://www.thestack.technology/is-your-platform-engineering-mature-enough-to-need-radius/
Mary Branscombe's avatar
Mary Branscombe
5mo

Like Dapr and its predecessor OAM (which underpins Crossplane), Radius originated in @markrussinovich.bsky.social 's Office of the CTO so I asked him to explain why organizations need an application modelling platform and what Radius offers; @salaboy.com and @rstephens.me told me how Dapr fits in

Mary Branscombe's avatar
Mary Branscombe
5mo

I talked to Millennium bank about putting it into production and early experimenters who say the new resource type makes Radius relevant for a lot more organizations who need to fit it into their own environments and will be going back to see what they can do with it now

Mary Branscombe's avatar
Mary Branscombe
5mo

the application modelling in Radius is exactly the kind of thing that appeals to me: I love (semi)structured definitions and visualisations that means everyone can see how things fit together; but it's overkill for some, you need to have enough problems and infrastructure expertise to do the work

Is your platform engineering mature enough to need Radius?

Is your platform engineering mature enough to need Radius?

How to actually describe an application in a way that includes all the technical details about its life cycle dependencies is actually pretty important…


https://www.thestack.technology/is-your-platform-engineering-mature-enough-to-need-radius/
Mary Branscombe's avatar
Mary Branscombe
5mo

and again, I've dived so deep that this piece is behind @thestack.bsky.social paywall; if I've quoted you and you don't have access, let me know and I'll connect you to my editor Ed Targett to get you a subscription comped

How to actually describe an application in a way that includes all the technical details about its life cycle dependencies is actually pretty important…
Is your platform engineering mature enough to need Radius?
How to actually describe an application in a way that includes all the technical details about its life cycle dependencies is actually pretty important…
https://www.thestack.technology/is-your-platform-engineering-mature-enough-to-need-radius/
  • open source

  • platform engineering

  • ALM

  • Radius

  • Kubernetes

  • CNCF

  • CNOE

  • Azure Office of the CTO

  • Dapr

  • pit of success

  • visualisation

  • application modelling

Subscribe to Mary Writes
to get updates in Reader, RSS, or via Bluesky Feed
Aspire brings .NET the enterprise tooling it always needed
Can OpenStack really replace VMware in organizations that still need to run their own virtualisation?

The Stack